Background: Cranial functional movement disorders (CFMDs) affect the face, eyes, jaw, tongue, and palate.
Objectives: We aimed to examine our large series of functional movement disorders (FMDs) patients where the cranial muscles were involved to determine their phenomenology and other clinical features.
Methods: This is a chart review of 26 patients who presented with CFMDs.
Results: There were 16 (61.53%) females and 10 (38.46%) male patients. The mean ± [standard deviation (SD)] age at the presentation was 33.96 ± 16.94 (Range: 11–83) years. The duration of symptoms ranged from one day to 6 years (Mean ±SD: 402.03 ±534.97 days). According to the Fahn-Williams criteria, CFMDs were documented in 24 patients and clinically established in two patients. The facial [38.46% (10/26)] involvement was the most common in our CFMDs patients. Oromandibular [19.23% (5/26)], ocular [15.38% (4/26)], lingual [15.38% (4/26)], speech [15.38% (4/26)] and palatal [(3.85; 1/26)] involvement was also seen. 10 (38.46%) patients also had associated FMD in the extracranial regions. Precipitating factors were present in 84.61% (22/26) of the patients and associated illnesses were present in 42.30% (11/26) of the patients. At 3 months follow-up, 9 (34.61%) patients had improved, 13 (50%) had partial improvement and 4 (15.38%) had no improvement.
Conclusions: There was a slight female preponderance in our patients. CFMDs are more likely to involve facial muscles. Associated medical conditions like neuropsychiatric disturbances and headaches are frequently present in CFMDs patients. Early clinical diagnosis will avoid unnecessary investigations and allow the patient to seek the right treatment.
The intriguing history of cranial functional movement disorders (CFMDs) dates back to the era of Jean-Martin Charcot in 1887 when on the first examination he had mistaken a patient with left-sided functional facial spasm for that of an organic facial palsy of the lower right half of the face . Later on, he went on to publish various drawings of similarly afflicted patients in his journal. A pupil of Charcot, Tourette, in 1889, described hysterical blepharospasm in the same journal . Gowers beautifully described the quivering movements of the orbicularis that did not resemble a true facial spasm, mentioned about ‘wrong way’ tongue deviation wherein the tongue would deviate to the side of facial spasm which is the opposite of what would be expected in a true pontomedullary lesion, and was perspicacious in his observation that these movements usually lessened by physical and mental rest and almost always increased by emotion, and by the movement of the face . Babinski with Froment and then Dejerine wrote about hysteric ‘glossolabial spasm’ [4, 5]. Casey Wood in 1898 in his essay titled ‘The Detection of Hysteria’ from an ophthalmological perspective wrote, ‘if one were to make a special study of that organ that most uniformly exhibit the evidence of hysteria, the eye would afford the most information, even more emphatically than the skin or the mucous membranes .
In the last decade, there are some important case series published regarding the description of cranial functional movement disorders (CFMDs) [7, 8, 9]. But still, the data remains scarce and cranial movement disorders affecting the eyes, tongue or other facial muscles are often an under-recognized feature of patients with functional movement disorders (FMDs).
In this study, we aimed to examine FMDs patients where the cranial muscles were involved to determine their phenomenology, precipitating factors, and associated co-morbidities and do a systematic review of the published literature.
This is a detailed chart review of 26 consecutive patients with CFMDs who attended our movement disorder clinic over the past 2 years and were diagnosed using the Fahn and Williams criteria . This retrospective chart review was done under our study on ‘Functional Neurological Disorder Patients’ approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC) of Maulana Azad Medical College and associated hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals according to the IEC guidelines. We also analyzed the videos of the patient to look for details regarding the phenomenology of the movement disorders. In addition to demographic details, data were also collected regarding the phenomenology, antecedent illnesses, precipitating factors, treatment received, and outcome. We made all efforts to contact the referring physician to get the previous medical records. All patients had received treatment with counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, and pharmacotherapy with consultation from the Psychiatry department. The outcome was categorized as improved, partially improved, and not improved at the end of three months. Patients who initially improved but had frequent relapses with a variable course during the three months were classified as partially improved. We also completed a PubMed search (Figure 1), on 28th March 2020, using the keywords ‘Cranial functional movement disorders’ and ‘Cranial psychogenic movement disorder’. Out of 311 articles that were retrieved, 25 relevant articles were included in our literature review.
The data was entered in the Microsoft office excel sheet and analysed using the SPSS software version 18. Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD) and as percentages and ranges. Frequencies between the various groups were compared using the χ2 test, and p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
|Demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 26)||Findings|
|1.||AGE||Mean ± standard deviation (SD): 33.96 ± 16.94 (Range: 11 to 83) years|
|Children (age of onset <18 years)||5 (19.23%)|
|Adults (18–60 years)||19 (73.07%)|
|Elderly (age of onset >60 years)||2 (7.69%)|
|3.||DURATION||Mean ± SD (402.03 ± 534.97),
Range: 1 day–6 years
|Abrupt: 7 (26.92%)||Gradual: 19 (73.07%)|
|5.||LEVEL OF CERTAINTY|
|Documented: 24 (92.30%)||Clinically established: 2 (7.69%)|
Ocular/peri-ocular: 4 (15.38%)
Blepharospasm: 1 (3.8%)
Ptosis 1 (3.8%)
Eyelid myoclonus: 1 (3.8%)
Eyebrow dyskinesia: 1 (3.8%)
Facial: 10 (38.46%)
Hemifacial spasm: 4 (15.38%)
Orofacial dyskinesia: 5 (19.23%)
Pure facial dyskinesia: 1 (3.8%)
Oromandibular: 5 (19.23%)
Lingual: 4 (15.38%)
Palatal: 1 (3.8%)
Speech: 2 (7.69%)
|7.||EXTRA-CRANIAL MOVEMENTS||10 (38.46%)|
|Shoulder shrugging: 2 (7.69%)||Twisting movements of upper limbs and neck: 1 (3.8%)|
|Upper limb tremors only: 3 (11.53%)||Neck dystonia: 1 (3.8%)|
|Upper limb tremors with lower limb
tremors: 1 (3.8%)
|Functional hemiparesis with
Numbness: 1 (3.8%)
|Writing problems: 1 (3.8%)|
|Emotional stress: 8 (30.76%)||Road traffic accident: 1 (3.8%)|
|Financial constraints: 6 (23.07%)||Gastric upset: 1 (3.8%)|
|Job pressure and work-related stress: 2 (7.69%)||Claustrophobia: 1 (3.8%)|
|Refusal to go to boarding school: 1 (3.8%)||Keen observation of his own face while shaving: 1 (3.8%)|
|Brother went missing from home: 1 (3.8%)|
|Headache: 4 (15.38%)|
Neuropsychiatric disturbances: 7 (26.92%)
Anxiety: 3 (11.53%)
Depression: 2 (7.69%)
Feelings of loneliness and isolation: 1 (3.8%)
Organic illnesses; 4 (15.38%)
Subdural hematoma: 1 (3.8%)
Seizure disorder: 1 (3.8%)
Organic cervical dystonia: 1 (3.8%)
Intracranial mass: 1 (3.8%)
|Improved: 9 (34.61%)||Did not improve: 4 (15.38%)|
|Partially improved: 13 (50%)|
|Case #||Age (years)/Sex
(M: Male, F: Female)
|Duration of illness||Onset-abrupt/gradual||Predominant cranial movement disorder||Additional cranial movement disorder||Additional extracranial movement disorder||Precipitating factor||Associated illness||Outcome|
|Case 1||34/F||5 days||Abrupt||Left hemifacial spasm||Jaw deviation to the left side||–||Fight with husband||–||Improved|
|Case 2||24/F||3 months||Gradual||Variable hemifacial spasm||Deviation of mouth to one side||Tremulousness of right upper and lower limbs||Family conflicts||–||Partially improved|
|Case 3||16/F||3 years||Gradual||Right hemifacial spasm||–||–||Family stress||Headache (Migraine)||Partially improved|
|Case 4||11/F||5 months||Gradual||Bilateral ptosis (Right > Left)||–||–||Refusal to go to boarding school||–||Partially improved|
|Case 5||24/F||One and half year||Gradual||Chin tremor||Twitching of left angle of mouth||Bilateral postural hand tremors with distractibility||Anxiety regarding her imminent marriage||–||Partially improved|
|Case 6||30/F||3 days||Abrupt||Tongue dystonia||–||–||Death of father-in-law who was the sole earning member of family and financial constraints||–||Improved|
|Case 7||16/F||4 months||Gradual||Palatal tremor||–||–||Brother went missing from home, sick uncle at home||Left occipital ganglioglioma||Partially improved|
|Case 8||83/F||4 months||Gradual||Lip-smacking movements with abnormal noises (orofacial dyskinesias)||–||Bilateral shoulder shrugging||Emotional stress as she was forced to stay away from her son||–||Improved|
|Case 9||40/M||2 days||Abrupt||Stuttering and effortful speech||–||Bilateral hand tremors that are variable, distractibility present||Financial loss due to short-circuit at home||–||Improved|
|Case 10||40/F||1 day||Abrupt||Child-like prosody||–||Left-sided functional hemiparesis with numbness||Financial constraints||Anxiety, depression, headaches||Partially improved|
|Case 11||35/M||6 years||Gradual||Eyebrow dyskinesia||Abnormal tongue movements||Bilateral hand tremors with distractibility||Financial issues||–||Improved|
|Case 12||25/M||3 years||Gradual||Orofacial dyskinesia||–||Twisting movements of upper limb and neck||–||Anxiety, loneliness, avoids friends||Partially improved|
|Case 13||62/M||15 days||Gradual||Orofacial dyskinesia||–||Bilateral shoulder shrugging||–||Subdural hematoma||Partially improved|
|Case 14||21/M||One month||Gradual||Orofacial dyskinesia||–||–||–||Neuropsychiatric disturbances||Partially improved|
|Case 15||37/M||One year||Gradual||Bruxism||–||–||Job pressure||–||Partially improved|
|Case 16||65/F||2 days||Abrupt||Mouth-opening dystonia||–||–||Claustrophobia during MRI||Organic cervical dystonia||Improved|
|Case 17||31/M||5 months||Gradual||Tongue tremor||–||–||Looking at himself in the mirror while shaving||–||Improved|
|Case 18||41/F||One year||Gradual||Oromandibular dyskinesia||Jaw deviation to the left side||–||Husband stays away in Dubai||–||Partially improved|
|Case 19||48/M||2–1/2 years||Gradual||Blepharospasm||Ocular tics for 1 year||Writing problems for 10 days||Work-related pressure||Anxiety||Partially improved|
|Case 20||25/F||1 day||Abrupt||Tongue dystonia||–||–||Gastric upset||–||Improved|
|Case 21||50/F||5 months||Gradual||Right hemifacial spasm||–||–||Depression||Not improved|
|Case 22||40/M||4 months||Gradual||Facial dyskinesia||–||–||Financial constraints||–||Not improved|
|Case 23||20/F||4 days||Abrupt||Jaw spasm||–||–||Road traffic accident 4 days back||–||Not improved|
|Case 24||13/M||3 years||Gradual||Bilateral eyelid myoclonus||–||–||Fight with a friend||Seizure disorder for 5 years, headache for 3 days||Partially improved|
|Case 25||16/F||3 years||Gradual||Tongue protrusion||–||Functional neck dystonia||Financial constraints||–||Improved|
|Case 26||36/F||2 years||Gradual||Orofacial dyskinesia||–||–||Fight with husband||Headache||Not improved|
In our cohort of 159 patients of FMDs, CFMDs were present in 26 patients (16.35%). The majority of our CFMDs patients were females (16; 61.53%) and their mean ± [SD] age was 33.96 ± [16.94] years (range 11 to 83 years). There were 5 children (age of onset <18 years) and 3 elderly (age of onset >60 years) patients in our cohort. The duration of illness ranged from one day to 6 years (mean± SD: 402.03 ±534.97 days).
Of the 26 patients diagnosed with CFMDs, 24 (92.30%) met the Fahn-Williams diagnostic criteria for the documented, and 2 (7.69%) for the clinically established. We have provided the videos of 9 patients highlighting the wide spectrum of phenomenology in our CFMDs cohort (See video). The onset of illness was abrupt in 26.92% (7/26) and gradual in 73.07% (19/26) of patients. Most of the patients had symptoms pertaining to either one half or the whole of the face with the majority having orofacial dyskinesias (n = 5; 19.23%) and hemifacial spasm (n = 4; 15.38%). Out of the 5 cases of orofacial dyskinesias, 3 were men and 2 were women. All the patients with hemifacial spasm were females and as compared to organic hemifacial spasm, it was seen to be fixed instead of clonic in Case 1 and inconsistent in their location (alternating from side to side) in Case 2 (See videos). Amongst the 4 (15.38%) cases with movements in and around the eyes, we had one case each of bilateral eye ptosis (Case 4: See video), blepharospasm, bilateral ‘painful’ eyelid myoclonus and eyebrow dyskinesia in the form of repetitive frontalis ‘overactivity’. The tongue involvement was seen in 4 patients (15.38%) in the form of dystonia (n = 3) and tremor (n = 1), and 3 of them were females. We came across several unusual phenomenologies including bruxism, chin tremor, mouth-opening dystonia, oromandibular dyskinesia, and jaw spasm each in one patient. Case 7 (See video) was that of a young female with a palatal tremor that disappeared on using a tongue depressor. There were 2 cases of functional speech and voice disorders both of which were abrupt in onset: a male with stuttering voice (Case 9: See video) and one female with childlike prosody along with left-sided functional hemiparesis with numbness (Case 10). Six of the 26 (23.07%) patients also had additional craniofacial movements along with the primary movement disorder.
Clinical incongruency and inconsistency are the hallmarks of the FMDs and are necessary for the diagnosis to be certain. Seventeen (65.38%) of our patients had variability in their symptoms, 10 (38.46%) had distractibility and 3 (11.53%) had entrainment.
Ten (38.46%) of our patients also had concomitant functional movements involving the body regions other than the craniofacial areas and what is remarkable is that 9 (90%) of them were related to the shoulder and upper limbs: 2 cases had bilateral shoulder-shrugging movements, 4 cases had bilateral upper limb tremors, one had twisting movements of upper limbs, one had writing difficulty for 10 days, and one patient also had left-sided hemiparesis with numbness of the same regions [Hoover’s sign was positive] with acute speech disturbance. Lower limb tremors and functional neck dystonia were present in one patient each.
Twenty-two (84.61%) out of 26 of our patients had a well-defined stressor for these abnormal movements. Family conflicts and emotional stress were the most common precipitating factors present in 30.76% (n = 8) of patients and interestingly, all cases with these stressors were females. In male patients, stress related to financial constraints was the most common precipitating factor. Two of the patients had physical inciting factors such as gastric upset and road traffic accidents. The children and young adults mostly had factors related to school stress and feelings of anxiety and social stress.
Nine of our patients had associated illnesses and 5 of them had neuropsychiatric issues in the form of anxiety and depression and 4 patients had associated headaches. Organic illnesses in the form of subdural hematoma, cervical dystonia, seizure disorder, and intracranial space-occupying lesion were present in 4 patients that couldn’t be attributable to the movement disorder the case presented with.
At the 3-months follow-up, 9 (34.61%) out of 26 patients had improved whereas 4 (15.38%) of them failed to show any improvement whatsoever. The overwhelming majority of the patients (13/26; 50%) had only partial recovery of their symptoms with a variable course.
Out of 311 articles that we retrieved for our systematic review, 25 were found to be relevant (Figure 1; supplementary online table [7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 26, 27, 28, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. Of the total number of 434 patients in all these studies, 191 (44%) were females and 48 (11%) were males. For the remaining 195 (44.93%) patients, gender was not specified. The majority of the patients were found to have some form of facial or eye involvement. The movement related to eyes was mostly unspecified (n = 188) with others being that of blepharospasm (n = 3) and pseudoptosis (n = 1). Out of all the abnormal facial movements, pure hemifacial spasm (37/152; 24.34%), and facial dystonia (17/152; 11.18%) were the most common. Other involved regions were jaw (n = 119), speech and voice (n = 107), platysma (n = 89), tongue (n = 79), palatal or lip (n = 33) and head (n = 10). The phenomenologies of 12 patients were not specified in the respective studies. For a total of 434 patients, 793 phenomenologies were described which translates into the fact that most of these patients had multiple functional movements involving various parts of the body. Clearly mentioned overlaps were observed in about 60 (16%) of 375 patients. The detailed phenomenologies of patients with overlaps were reported by Factor et al  [head tremor with eyelid fluttering (n = 1), blepharospasm with dysphonia (n = 1), and head tremor with intermittent tongue protrusion (n = 1)], Chung et al  [(speech abnormality with some facial abnormal movement (n = 5)], Kamble et al  [abnormal head movements + tremors (n = 2), mutism + gait abnormality (n = 2), facial dystonia + mutism (n = 2), palatal myoclonus + astasia abasia + facial dystonia (n = 1) and facial dystonia + tremors (n = 2)] and Stone et al  [one case with right “pseudoptosis” with contraction of orbicularis oculis and oris which gave an impression of right facial weakness with unilateral photophobia in the right eye]. In a study of the 101 patients with functional abnormalities, Teodoro et al reported that effortful facial expression and other responses (e.g. frowning, grimacing, effortful breathing) in 26.7% of patients and/or excessive blinking in 38.6% of patients predominated, with at least one of them being present in 40.6% (41/101) patients .
This is a case series of 26 patients with various CFMDs collected over 2 years. The prevalence of FMDs is two to three times higher in women than in men and this is well evident in our study in which the majority of the patients were young females (16/26; 61.53%) .
Ocular or peri-ocular movements seem to be common when it comes to FMDs as is evident from two other case series (Fasano et al with 51% patients out of 61 cases and Stone et al with 90% patients out of 41 cases) with a large number of cases with at least some form of eye involvement [7, 8]. We had 4 patients who had abnormal movements related to the eyes: one patient each of bilateral ptosis, blepharospasm, eyebrow dyskinesia, and bilateral ‘painful’ eyelid myoclonus. In a large series of 101 patients clinical examination triggered facial and eye movement disorders in 46% of patients, but, this phenomenon was not observed in any of our patients . In the same vein, Stone et al in 2010 reported a case with recurrent episodes of right “pseudoptosis” with contraction of orbicularis oculis and oris which gave an impression of right facial weakness with unilateral photophobia in the right eye . Our patients did not have any concomitant facial abnormal movements. Convergence spasm has been previously reported as the most frequent functional eye movement disorder and it was seen in as many as 69% of FMDs cases in a study reporting 13 patients [9, 16]. However, we did not come across any patient with convergence spasm.
Out of our 26 patients, 10 of them had varied facial involvement among which 5 had orofacial dyskinesias, 4 were that of hemifacial spasm and one patient had pure facial dyskinesia. In 2001, Tan et al reported 5 patients (all females) and in 2016, Baizabal-Carvallo et al reported 15 patients with facial movement [17, 18]. Consistent with the literature, all our 4 hemifacial spasm patients were females. The onset of the movements was gradual in all of them barring one in whom the onset was abrupt. The clues to psychogenicity in these patients were movements mostly involved in the lower half of the face, were variable and distractible. In one case it was seen to be fixed instead of clonic and in another movement were inconsistent in their location (alternating from side to side) . None of our patients reported facial spasms during sleep (said to be present in up to 80% of organic hemifacial spasm or any worsening of spasms during voluntary facial contractions (seen in up to 39% of hemifacial spasm patients); most patients had lower-face involvement at onset in contrast to the isolated lid involvement typically present at the onset in organic hemifacial spasm .
Several case series have shown the very relevant involvement of this system when it comes to facial functional movement disorders (FFMDs) [7, 8]. The most common phenotype is tonic jaw deviation accompanying ipsilateral downward and lateral lip pulling, seen in 84.3% of patients with FFMDs involving the craniofacial region but we did not have any such patient in our series which perhaps highlights the varied presentations of FMDs in different geographic areas . Yoshida et al in their very recent study, recorded 58 patients with FMDs in the stomatognathic system in which functional dystonia phenotype was observed in 44.8% and 27.6% of their patients showed very fast repeated jaw and/or lingual movements and 72.4% of their cases were females . This data is similar to our study in which 77.7% (7/9) patients were women. What is significant and should be noted is that 50% of the cases of the Yoshida et al study reported pain whereas none of our patients reported it . Also, none of our patients had precipitating factors such as dental (44.8%) or physical trauma (12.1%) that were the commonest causes seen in the study published by Yoshida et al . Whereas abnormal jaw and tongue movements have been earlier reported in various case series, none of them describing bruxism as our study has [7, 8, 20]. Functional palatal and lip tremors have been reported but functional chin tremor is rare and we report one such case (Case 5; see video) [20, 21]. We also report one young girl (Case 7; see video) with a psychogenic palatal tremor that was accompanied by bilateral ear clicking. Biller et al in 2013 proposed to segregate essential palatal tremor into 3 clinical overlapping variants: psychogenic, un-voluntary or secondary essential, and voluntary essential palatal tremor . Also, as per the literature, the female gender and the presence of bilateral ear clicking in our patient is consistent with psychogenicity . Our patient did not have acute upper respiratory tract infection as a precipitating factor as reported in other studies [21, 24]. Platysma overactivity has been commonly reported previously to co-exist with FFMDs (61% in Fasano et al, 85% in Stone et al) but only 7.6% (2/26) of our patients were found to have it [7, 8].
Various studies have reported that between 16.5% and 53% of FMDs patients have a comorbid functional abnormality in speech or voice [11, 25, 26, 27, 28]. While dysphonia, stuttering, and prosodic abnormalities are common among functional voice and speech disorders (FSVDs), it is important to realize that any aspect of speech or phonation may be affected . Acquired organic stuttering often presents with dysarthria, aphasia, or apraxia of speech; the absence of these features is a red flag for a functional etiology . One female in our cohort had abrupt onset functional hemiparesis with concomitant functional child-like prosody and 3 out of the 6 cases reported by Chung et al who had prosodic disturbances were females as well . We report one male patient (Case 9: See video) with functional stuttering (FS) and this is consistent with the literature that says that FS is equally prevalent among males and females, contrasting with the 3:1 male: female ratio observed in patients with organic stuttering . In contrast with organic motor speech disorders (OMSDs), patients with FSVDs often exhibit inconsistencies and considerable variability in their speech or phonation and their symptoms may alter considerably with distraction or suggestibility . Patients with FSVDs may also exhibit struggle behaviour resulting in exaggerated facial movements, including marked facial grimacing, lip pursing, eye blinking or contraction of the periorbital, lower facial muscles, or platysma during an attempted speech . Patients complaining of weakness may paradoxically exhibit speech with a strained quality or exaggerated facial posturing that is inconsistent with their complaint of weakness . Also, the course of FSVDs can be highly variable and in one conversation many qualitative changes in the character of the dysphonia or severity of the symptoms can occur and symptom reversibility is one of the most important clinical features of FSVDs . It is crucial to diagnose these disorders as deficits in patients with FSVDs also have a greater potential for reversibility than those in OMSDs patients and while speech therapy rarely provides improvement for patients with OMSDs, various studies have documented that a course of speech therapy can be quite effective for many patients with FSVDs [12, 33].
The co-occurrence of different functional disorders is well known . 38.46% (10/26) of our patients had concomitant functional movements involving the body regions other than the craniofacial areas and 90% (9/10) of them were related to the shoulder and upper limbs. This seems to be consistent with the literature as extra-facial contractions involved upper limb in 30% of the 61 patients in the series by Fasano et al and 78% patients out of the 41 cases evaluated by Stone et al had evidence of functional limb weakness and 22% had limb dystonia [7, 8].
Since the advent of modern psychiatry, a correlation between the experience of emotional trauma and psychogenic symptoms has been postulated . Kletenik et al pointed out that trauma and adverse life events are important risk factors for developing FMDs and they have also reported that the higher prevalence of FMDs in women is likely related to both higher rates of sexual abuse against women and the impact of sexual abuse in women . But in our Indian society, there seems to be a significant impact of culture, ethnicities, and other psychosocial variations on the precipitating factors. We differ from the western literature when it comes to precipitating factors for FMDs as, in our country, even today, there are germane concerns regarding a lack of proper communication between the physician and the patient, especially women, who do not usually come out with complaints of sexual abuse or marital conflicts to avoid running the risk of social embarrassment. Seven out of sixteen women (43.75%) in our study, however, did cite familial disharmony on careful probing and three of them reported financial difficulties. 5 out of 10 men (50%) had been facing financial constraints and work-related stress, whereas, in children, family separation, school-related performance pressure, tiffs with friends, and absence of a sibling were common propellants in our study. Physical stressors seem to be relatively less common with one case with a prior history of a road traffic accident and one with a preceding bout of severe gastric upset. Two of our patients had interesting risk factors with one case developing the FMD after an episode of claustrophobia and one case who developed tongue tremor while keenly observing himself in the mirror during shaving.
Eleven out of twenty-six (42.30%) of our patients had some form of associated illness. Four of them reported headaches (4/26; 15.38%) which is similar to the study conducted by Stone et al in which migraine triggered functional facial movement disorders in 17% of the patients  Neuropsychiatric disturbances ruled the roost with seven (26.92%; 7/26) of our patients reporting it either in the form of anxiety, depression, feelings of loneliness and isolation with one of them not being specified. Depression and headache were also common in the series by Fasano et al . Other organic clinical entities that were found to co-exist in 15.38% (4/26) patients. Examples include subdural hematoma, organic cervical dystonia, seizure disorder, and an intracranial mass was found in one patient each and this observation is important as it emphasizes the fact that quite often organic and functional pathologies can overlap and that the presence of an organic pathology does not rule out a functional element or vice versa.
Little is known about the course and the outcome in CFMDs patients. At the end of three months, 34.61% of our patients had improved with no relapses, 15.38% did not show any improvement and an overwhelming majority of 50% patients showed partial improvement only with a variable course. In the study reported by Fasano et al, the course was stable in 53%, variable in 33%, and had diurnal fluctuations in one-fifth.
Certain limitations should be kept in mind before the interpretation of the results of our study. The major limitation was represented by its retrospective chart review design, which has certain inherent errors such as missing data, recall bias, and follow-up details. Further, our patients did not follow a standard protocol-based treatment which may have affected the outcome. There were some inadvertent limitations in the systematic literature review also which was markedly affected by the incomplete data provided in various studies. We were not able to figure out the genders of a huge majority of cases and phenomenologies of all the patients could not be well delineated as many authors presented their data in the form of percentages only and we could only roughly calculate the probable patient number [7, 8].
Despite all these limitations, our study has reported some important observations regarding CFMDs patients. First, females were more likely to have CFMDs similar to other FMDs and facial involvement was more likely to occur than other cranial musculatures. Second, we have reported some unusual phenomenologies like chin tremor, ptosis, eyebrow dyskinesia, and bruxism. Third, functional movements involving the body regions other than the craniofacial areas were present in one third (38.46%) of our patients and 90% of them were related to the shoulder and upper limbs. Fourth, precipitating factors were present in 84.61% of the patients and associated illnesses were present in 42.30% of the patients. The most common precipitating factors in females were emotional and familial stress, whereas financial stress was the most common in males. Fifth, one-third of our patients had a good outcome, whereas half of the patients had a variable course.
Our study has provided additional data regarding CFMDs from India, once again reinforcing the fact that FMDs are universally present and that it is important for neurologists to be aware of signs and symptoms suggestive of FMD. The CFMDs should be considered if there is fixed unilateral facial contraction supported by normal neurological examination. There is some geographical variation regarding the phenomenology also, like convergence eye movement and lower lip commonly described in CFMDs patients were not seen in our cohort. An early diagnosis based on the phenomenology is important as it will avoid unnecessary diagnostic investigations and allow early intervention with the appropriate therapy.
We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in the ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
We also confirm that all patients have given written informed consent for the publication of their video.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Dr. Anumeha Mishra: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 3A, 3B
Dr. Sanjay Pandey: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3B
Dejerine JJ, Dejerine J, Gauckler E. The psychoneuroses and their treatment by psychotherapy. JB Lippincott Company; 1913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14543-000
Wood CA. The methods employed in examining the eyes for the detection of hysteria. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1898 Nov 12; 31(20): 1136–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1898.92450200004001a
Fasano A, Valadas A, Bhatia KP, Prashanth LK, Lang AE, Munhoz RP, Morgante F, Tarsy D, Duker AP, Girlanda P, Bentivoglio AR. Psychogenic facial movement disorders: clinical features and associated conditions. Movement disorders. 2012 Oct; 27(12): 1544–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25190
Stone J, Hoeritzauer I, Tesolin L, Carson A. Functional movement disorders of the face: A historical review and case series. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2018 Dec 15; 395: 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2018.09.031
Kaski D, Bronstein AM, Edwards MJ, Stone J. Cranial functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. The Lancet Neurology. 2015 Dec 1; 14(12): 1196–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00226-4
Factor SA, Podskalny GD, Molho ES. Psychogenic movement disorders: frequency, clinical profile, and characteristics. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1995 Oct 1; 59(4): 406–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.59.4.406
Chung DS, Wettroth C, Hallett M, Maurer CW. Functional speech and voice disorders: Case series and literature review. Movement disorders clinical practice. 2018 May; 5(3): 312–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12609
Kamble NL, Pal PK. Electrophysiological evaluation of psychogenic movement disorders. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2016 Jan 1; 22: S153–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.016
Stone J, Carson A. Psychogenic/dissociative/functional facial symptoms—a case report. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2010 Oct 1; 81(10): e8–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.217554.20
Teodoro T, Cunha JM, Abreu LF, Yogarajah M, Edwards MJ. Abnormal Eye and Cranial Movements Triggered by Examination in People with Functional Neurological Disorder. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2019 Jul 4; 43(4): 240–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2018.1536998
Fekete R, Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Ha AD, Davidson A, Jankovic J. Convergence spasm in conversion disorders: prevalence in psychogenic and other movement disorders compared with controls. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Feb 1; 83(2): 202–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-300733
Tan EK, Jankovic J. Psychogenic hemifacial spasm. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2001 Aug; 13(3): 380–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.13.3.380
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Distinguishing features of psychogenic (functional) versus organic hemifacial spasm. Journal of neurology. 2017 Feb 1; 264(2): 359–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8356-0
Wang A, Jankovic J. Hemifacial spasm: clinical findings and treatment. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 1998 Dec; 21(12): 1740–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199812)21:12>1740::AID-MUS17<3.0.CO;2-V
Yoshida K. Clinical Characteristics of Functional Movement Disorders in the Stomatognathic System. Front. Neurol. 11: 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00123
Stamelou M, Saifee TA, Edwards MJ, Bhatia KP. Psychogenic palatal tremor may be underrecognized: reappraisal of a large series of cases. Movement disorders. 2012 Aug; 27(9): 1164–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.24948
Biller J. Nosography of the “essential”. Neurology. 2013 Aug 20; 81(8): 772–773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a1aab3
Zadikoff C, Lang AE, Klein C. The ‘essentials’ of essential palatal tremor: a reappraisal of the nosology. Brain. 2006 Apr 1; 129(4): 832–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh684
Morini A, Boninsegna C, Nostro M, Orrico D, Moretto G, Tinazzi M. Palatal tremor suppressed by mouth opening. Journal of neurology. 2005 Nov 1; 252(11): 1335–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0861-5
Hinson VK, Cubo E, Comella CL, Goetz CG, Leurgans S. Rating scale for psychogenic movement disorders: scale development and clinimetric testing. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2005 Dec; 20(12): 1592–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20650
Saifee TA, Kassavetis P, Pareés I, Kojovic M, Fisher L, Morton L, Foong J, Price G, Joyce EM, Edwards MJ. Inpatient treatment of functional motor symptoms: a long-term follow-up study. Journal of neurology. 2012 Sep 1; 259(9): 1958–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6530-6
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Speech and voice disorders in patients with psychogenic movement disorders. Journal of neurology. 2015 Nov 1; 262(11): 2420–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7856-7
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Functional (psychogenic) stereotypies. Journal of neurology. 2017 Jul 1; 264(7): 1482–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8551-7
Binder LM, Spector J, Youngjohn JR. Psychogenic stuttering and other acquired nonorganic speech and language abnormalities. Archives of clinical neuropsychology. 2012 Aug 1; 27(5): 557–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs051
Duffy JR. Functional speech disorders: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. In Handbook of clinical neurology. 2016 Jan 1; 139: 379–388. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00033-3
Baker J. Functional voice disorders: Clinical presentations and differential diagnosis. In Handbook of clinical neurology. 2016 Jan 1; 139: 389–405. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801772-2.00034-5
Mahr G, Leith W. Psychogenic stuttering of adult onset. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1992 Apr; 35(2): 283–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3502.283
Espay AJ, Goldenhar LM, Voon V, Schrag A, Burton N, Lang AE. Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: an international survey of movement disorder society members. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2009 Jul 15; 24(9): 1366–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22618
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Hallett M, Jankovic J. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Neurobiology of disease. 2019 Feb 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.013
Kletenik I, Sillau SH, Isfahani SA, LaFaver K, Hallett M, Berman BD. Gender as a Risk Factor for Functional Movement Disorders: the role of sexual abuse. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020 Feb; 7(2): 177–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12863
Lang AE, Koller WC, Fahn S. Psychogenic parkinsonism. Archives of Neurology. 1995 Aug 1; 52(8): 802–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540320078015
Hinson VK, Haren WB. Psychogenic movement disorders. The Lancet Neurology. 2006 Aug 1; 5(8): 695–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70523-3
Ferrara J, Jankovic J. Psychogenic movement disorders in children. Movement disorders. 2008 Oct 15; 23(13): 1875–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22220
Ertan S, Uluduz D, Özekmekçi S, Kiziltan G, Ertan T, Yalçinkaya C, Özkara Ç. Clinical characteristics of 49 patients with psychogenic movement disorders in a tertiary clinic in Turkey. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2009 Apr 15; 24(5): 759–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22114
Kranick S, Ekanayake V, Martinez V, Ameli R, Hallett M, Voon V. Psychopathology and psychogenic movement disorders. Movement Disorders. 2011 Aug 15; 26(10): 1844–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23830
Yaltho TC, Jankovic J. The many faces of hemifacial spasm: differential diagnosis of unilateral facial spasms. Movement Disorders. 2011 Aug 1; 26(9): 1582–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23692
Czarnecki K, Thompson JM, Seime R, Geda YE, Duffy JR, Ahlskog JE. Functional movement disorders: successful treatment with a physical therapy rehabilitation protocol. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2012 Mar 1; 18(3): 247–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.10.011
Batla A, Stamelou M, Edwards MJ, Pareés I, Saifee TA, Fox Z, Bhatia KP. Functional movement disorders are not uncommon in the elderly. Movement Disorders. 2013 Apr; 28(4): 540–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25350
Erro R, Cordivari C, Catania S, Bhatia KP, Edwards MJ. Fixed Dystonia of the Tongue. Movement disorders clinical practice. 2014 Jun; 1(2): 134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12026
Colosimo C. Tonic lip deviation as a distinctive form of psychogenic facial dystonia. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2015; 1(358): 486–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.1552
Gözke E, Saraçoğlu BC, Eser M, Reyhani A, Ak PD. Psychogenic facial movement disorder: a case report. Int. J. Clin. Neurosci. Ment. Health. 2016; 3(S1): S18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21035/ijcnmh.2016.3(Suppl.1).S18