Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with various neurological symptoms [1, 2]. Numerous putative dissemination mechanisms of the central nervous system (CNS) were hypothesized, including direct retrograde spread through the olfactory nerve via the transcribiform pathway or hematogenous spread via the blood-brain barrier. The neuronal damage could happen through different but not mutually exclusive mechanisms, including direct viral insult, cytokine release syndrome, hypoxia, immune-mediated neuroinflammation (post or para-infectious), coagulopathy, and endothelial dysfunction syndrome . Headache, altered mental status (encephalopathy), chemosensory dysfunction (anosmia, ageusia), cerebrovascular events, and myalgia seem to be the most typical neurological manifestations . However, the description of the isolated virus in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is seemingly rare, suggesting that direct viral meningoencephalitis is not usual.
Movement disorders are increasingly being described not only among hospitalized patients but also in milder cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, despite a possible very low prevalence in comparison to the total cases [3, 4]. This study aims to summarize and describe, through a systematic procedure, relevant clinical and ancillary exam findings in patients with new-onset movement disorders associated with COVID-19.
We first searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for relevant literature published in the English language, between the initial descriptions of COVID-19 (December 31, 2019) and January 25, 2021, using the search terms “COVID-19” OR “SARS-CoV-2” OR “Coronavirus Disease 2019” OR “2019 n-CoV” OR “2019 Novel Coronavirus” AND (“movement disorders” OR “myoclonus” OR “ataxia” OR “parkinsonism” OR “Parkinson’s disease” OR “chorea” OR “dystonia” OR “myoclonus” OR “catatonia” OR “tremor”)” as search terms (n = 332). We added filters for Case Reports, Classical Articles, Clinical Studies, Clinical Trial, Comparative Studies, Original Journal Articles, Letters, Observational Studies, Human Species and identified 296 records for screening (titles/abstracts). We conducted a prospection in the reference list of selected papers and other sources, identifying additional 19 items. After excluding 115 records with abstracts and titles irrelevant to this study’s scope, we screened 200 records for eligibility. We evaluated 81 full-text papers for eligibility after withdrawing 119 articles for the following reasons: they were not written in English or were focused on social or healthcare impact of COVID-19 in patients already diagnosed with a movement disorder, dealt with aggravation of pre-existing movement disorders, telemedicine management strategies, or were listed as review/hypothesis/opinion articles (Figure 1). A total of 44 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis as representative of neurological descriptions of new-onset movement disorders in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Two authors (PB and TG) collected data independently, using a predefined protocol. One of the five authors (PB) checked the extracted data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus between the two data collectors. Variables of interest included counts for single or combined movement disorders (myoclonus, dystonia, ataxia, parkinsonism, chorea, catatonia, action/postural tremors, oculomotor disturbances), associated clinical features (encephalopathy, stroke), summaries of ancillary exam results (FDG-PET, MRI/CT, ENMG, CSF, and EEG). The attempted treatment options (symptomatic treatment or immunotherapy, such as intravenous immunoglobulin – IVIg, steroids) were also counted. Clinical characteristics were quantified as case counts and ratios of case counts to total cases. Symptoms not initially reported in individual studies were considered absent (zero) rather than missing (NA).
Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Wizard v2.0.4 (Evan Miller, 2020, https://www.wizardmac.com) and R v4.0.4 (https://www.R-project.org/). A world map including the reported cases was generated using Datawrapper (https://app.datawrapper.de). The “brms” R package was used to obtain the parameter values’ Bayesian posterior distribution . “Brms” uses the logit-link to convert the linear predictor zi (zero-inflated) to a probability. The logit-link accepts values between 0 and 1 and returns values on the real line. As a result, it enables the conversion of probabilities to linear predictors. Samples were drawn using No-U-Turn-Sampler (NUTS) sampling, the default algorithm used by the Stan program . Rhat was used as a potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at convergence, Rhat = 1). We fit the model using four Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo (HMC) chains. We used Jeffrey’s beta (0.5, 0.5) as the prior argument for zi rather than the default “flat” beta (1, 1) used by “brms”. The intercept parameter prior was normal (0, 10). The Bayesian plot was created using the “bayesplot” R package (https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/) .
Using counts as the measure of movement disorders frequency (main variables extracted from the articles), we performed an unsupervised grouping procedure (clustering) to separate and observe co-occurrence between the symptoms in the reported articles. The “NbClust” R package was used to determine the optimal number of clusters . It provides 30 indices for that task and proposes the best clustering scheme by varying all combinations of several clusters, distance measures, and clustering methods (Supplementary Figure 1). We then employed a random forest (RF) clustering strategy to avoid variable transformation (e.g., categorical features). By forming two unique groups (as determined by the NbClust’s method), RF clustering separated the original data from the virtual clusters. The similarity between two data instances was assessed using the proportion of trees that shared a single leaf node. The PAM (partition around medoids) technique  was used to assign each object to the closest medoid (object with the smallest dissimilarity) as a step to create the clusters.
Forty-four initial papers were ultimately chosen from a total of 81 full-text articles that were evaluated for eligibility, including a total of 93 specific cases of movement disorders caused by or acutely linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection or its pharmacological treatment attempts. Table 1 summarizes these cases and publications.
|AUTHORS, YEAR, COUNTRY, STUDY DESIGN||CLINICAL SCENARIO, CASE COUNT, METHOD, SEVERITY||MOV. DISORDERS PRESENTATION||NEUROIMAGING||CSF OR RELEVANT LAB STUDIES||NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES||TREATMENT|
|Romero-Sánchez et al., , Spain, Retr., Obs.,||Hospital setting, 6 cases, RT-qPCR or serology||6 cases: hyperkinetic mov.. 3 patients w/ mostly myoc. tremor and 3 w/ tardive synd. w/ oromandibular dyskinesia and tremor (related to neuroleptics)||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Studart-Neto et al., , Brazil, Retr., Obs.||Hospital setting, 6 cases, RT-qPCR, 2 inpatient, 4 ICU – mechanical ventilation||6 cases: hyperkinetic mov. (myoc.); 4 of those w/ encephalopathy and one w/ a cerebrovascular disorder||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Faber et al., , Brazil, Case report||Hospital setting, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Anosmia and acute levodopa-responsive parkinsonism||
FDG-PET: Normal glucosemetab. in
MRI (3T), normal neuromelanin and nigrosome1 imaging;
TRODAT-1 SPECT: Nigrostriatal denervation
|Méndez-Guerrero et al., , Spain, Case report||Hospital setting, 1 case, RT-qPCR, ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||Hyposmia, generalized rest and postural myoc., fluctuating consciousness, opsoclonus, and an asymmetric parkinsonian synd.||
DaT-SPECT: Bilat. decrease in presynaptic dopamine uptake asymmetrically involving both putamina;
|Unremarkable||EEG: diffuse mild and reactive slowing||Levetiracetam, not-responsive to apomorphine|
|Piscitelli et al.  Italy, Case report||Hospital setting, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Functional tremor w/ entrainment phenomenon and distractibility||Normal brain and spine MRI||N/A||SSEP: normal in legs||Supportive|
|Mas Serrano et al., , Spain, Case report||Hospital setting,
2 cases, RT-qPCR,
|Serotonergic synd. (w/ myoc.) due to association of lopinavir/ritonavir and psychotropic drugs (duloxetine, lithium, risperidone, haloperidol, morphine)||
Case 1: normal MRI
Case 2: normal CT
|High levels of CPK.||EEG w/ encephalopathic findings (both cases)||
Case 1: cyproheptadine
Case 2: clonazepam
|Rábano-Suárez et al., , Spain, Case series||Hospital setting, 3 cases (2 w/ a typical clinical scenario and lung CT scan, 1 RT-qPCR), 1 ICU and mechanical ventilation, 2 inpatient||Generalized myoc. and hypersomnia||
Case 1, 3: normal MRI,
Case 2: normal head CT;
Case 1: Unremarkable
Case 2, 3: not reported
|EEG: mild background slowing (3)||3 cases w/ CS (MP), 2 cases w/ clonazepam and levetiracetam, 1 case w/ valproic acid|
|Cuhna et al. , France, Case series||Hospital, 5 cases, RT-qPCR, ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||3 subjects w/ act. and postural tremor in UL, one patient w/ hemicorporal act. tremor, one w/ jerky tremor; All w/ mild motor deficit||
MRI: microbleeds (4), unilateral nigrossomal abnormality (1)
SPECT: frontotemporal hypoperfusion (1)
DAT-Scans: normal (4).
|N/A||EEG/ENMG: cortical/subcortical myoc. (2), short myoclonic bursts.||N/A|
|Paterson et al., , United Kingdom, Retr., Obs.||Hospital, 2 cases RT-qPCR, Inpatient||
Case 1: encephalopathy case w/ act. tremor and LL ataxia;
Case 2: opsoclonus, stimulus sensitive myoc., hyperekplexia, and convergence spasm
Case 1: neuroimaging within normal limits;
Case 2: normal Brain MRI;
|Case 2: unremarkable||Case 2: EEG: unremarkable||
Case 1: supportive;
Case 2: steroids, levetiracetam, clonazepam
|Chaumont et al. , France, Case series||Hospital 4 cases, RT-qPCR, ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||Mixed central and peripheral features: encephalopathy (4), ataxia (4), postural and act. myoc. (4), and polyneuropathy (4)||MRI: 3 cases w/ normal brain imaging, one w/ recent stroke in MCA territory;||Mildly elevated protein levels (2)||
EEG: background slowing (3); normal (1).
ENMG: motor demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (3) or diffuse lower motor neuron involvement (1)
|IVIg 0.4 g/kg (4), steroids (3)|
|Dijkstra et al. , Belgium, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Action-induced myoclonic jerks, stuttering speech hyposmia, transient ocular flutter, gait ataxia, attention and memory deficits, hypervigilance, and insomnia.||Normal brain and spinal MRI
PET-CT: neg. screening for neoplasia.
|Unremarkable, neg. autoimmune and paraneoplastic antineuronal Abs||N/A||CS and IVIg|
|Gutiérrez-Ortiz et al. , Spain, Case report||Hospital, 2 cases, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Anosmia, ageusia, right internuclear ophthalmoparesis, right fascicular oculomotor palsy, ataxia, areflexia, (Miller-Fisher synd.)||Head CT: normal (2)||Pos. GD1b-IgG (1), albuminocytologic dissociation (2), mildly elevated CSF protein levels.||N/A||
Case 1: IVIg
Case 2: supportive, spontaneous recovery
|Lantos et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Progressive ophthalmoparesis (left CN III and Bilat. CN VI palsies), ataxia, and hyporeflexia (Miller-Fisher synd.)||MRI: prominent enhancement w/ gadolinium, T2 hyperintense left oculomotor nerve (CN III)||Neg. GD1b-IgG,||N/A||IVIg|
|Balestrino et al., , Italy, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Asthenia, gait ataxia, balance impairment, confusion, and drowsiness||Head CT: Unremarkable||N/A||EEG: focal delta slowing, sporadic spikes||Lopinavir/ritonavir, chloroquine, CS and levofloxacin|
|Mao et al. , China, Retr., Obs.||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||Ataxia and severe COVID-19 infection||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Fadakar et al., , Iran, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Myalgia, progressive vertigo, headache, dysarthria, and cerebellar ataxia.||MRI: edema of cerebellar hemispheres and vermis, leptomeningeal enhancement.||Mild lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, and lactate dehydrogenase and pos. for SARS-CoV-2, Neg. antineuronal Abs panel||N/A||Lopinavir/ritonavir|
|Xiong et al. , China, Retr., Obs.||Hospital, 2 cases, RT-qPCR Inpatient||Tics/tremor (functional?). Case 1: 8 days after initial symptoms Case 2: 41 days after initial symptoms||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Klein et al. , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, diagnostic method not available, Inpatient||Bilat. intention tremor and wide-based gait (ataxia)||Head CT and angioCT: no abnormalities; Brain MRI: no acute findings||N/A||N/A||Propranolol|
|Cohen et al., , Israel, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Hypomimia and hypophonia. Cogwheel rigidity in neck, right arm, left arm, Asymmetric bradykinesia, no tremor. Slow gait, no right arm swing. No postural instability.||
¹⁸F-DOPA PET: asymmetrically decreased uptake in putamens, more apparent on the left side.
|Unremarkable, Neg. for GABA type B receptors, NMDAR, CASPR2, AMPA receptor type 1, AMPA receptor type 2, and LGI1.||EEG: unremarkable||Low-dose pramipexol|
|Sanguinetti & Ramdhani., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Appendicular and axial ataxia, act. myoc., act. tremor, Spontaneous horizontal and vertical eye oscillations (opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia synd.)||Brain MRI- normal||N/A||N/A||CS and IVIG (400mg/kg/d, 5d)|
|Ros-Castelló et al. , Spain, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||Myoc. in UL and neg. myoc. in LL, leading to falls, delayed onset||Brain MRI: cortical and brainstem ischemic lesions (hyperintensities in DWI and FLAIR)||N/A||N/A||Low-dose clonazepam|
|Wright et al., , New Zealand, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Saccadic oscillations (ocular flutter and opsoclonus) and gait ataxia, w/ no myoc., encephalopathy||Brain MRI: chronic white matter changes||N/A||N/A||Supportive, deceased|
|Muccioli et al. , Italy, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, ICU w/ mechanical ventilation||Multifocal myoc. elicited by act. and tactile stim., predominant in the right proximal LL||Brain MRI: chronic white matter changes||Mild pleocytosis (5 cells/μL), elevated protein (75mg/dL), neg. SARS-CoV2 PCR, elevated IL-8. Neg. antineuronal Abs.||
PolyEMG: multifocal positive myoc. w/ a burst of 140 -220 milliseconds
EEG-EMG back-averaging: no jerk-locked discharges.
|Levetiracetam and clonazepam|
|Borroni et al., , Italy, Case series||Hospital, 2 cases, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Diaphragmatic myoc. (jerky contractions of abdominal muscles, diaphragm);||
Brain MRI: normal
Head CT: normal;
Case 1: mild pleocytosis (8 cells/mm3).
Case 2: lymphocytosis (24 cell/mm3), increased protein (46 mg/dL).
Case 1: EMG: 3 Hz synchronous discharges EEG: normal; SSEP: normal
Case 2: EEG: synchronous and asynchronous LPDs (w/ myoc.);
Case 1: low dose clonazepam
Case 2: levetiracetam
|Schellekens et al., , Netherlands, Case report||Outpatient, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Generalized myoc. jerks of trunk, face, and limbs, particularly UL, at rest, worsened w/ posture and action. Cerebellar ataxia.||Brain MRI: unremarkable.||Normal routine profile; neg. for Paraneoplastic antineuronal Abs.||N/A||Levetiracetam|
|Anand et al., , USA, Case series||Hospital, 8 cases, RT-qPCR, 7 ICU w/ mechanical ventilation, 1 inpatient||Stimulus- or action-induced myoc. (7) and spontaneous myoc. (1). Generalized (5) and UL myoc. (3).||
Head CTs: unremarkable (5)
MRI: unspecific temporal T2 hyperintensity (1)
MRI: Diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement (1)
|Normal protein (2),
High protein levels (83 mg/dL) (1), normal cell count (3)
|EEG: Bifrontal sharp waves (1), background slowing (2)||Levetiracetam (3), Ketamine (1), dexmedetomidine (5), midazolam (1), lorazepam (3), primidone (1), clonazepam (1), valproic acid (3)|
|Grimaldi et al., , France, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Act. tremor, cerebellar ataxia, stimulus-sensitive and spontaneous diffuse myoc.||
Brain MRI: Unremarkable
¹⁸F-FDG PET: Putaminal and cerebellum hypermetab., diffuse cortical hypometab.
|Normal cell count, mildly elevated protein level (49 mg/dL), neg. RT-qPCR, and neg. OCBs.
Immunostaining: Abs against nuclei of Purkinje, striatal and hippocampal neurons.
|EEG: background slowing, reactive to stimulation (1)||IVIg, IV CS, Low-dose clonazepam|
|Byrnes et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Homeless and drug-addicted. Encephalopathy and choreiform mov.||Brain MRI: Multiple focal enhancing lesions: Bilat. putamen and cerebellum. Several cortical and subcortical lesions, hippocampus, right basal ganglia.||Mildly lymphocytic pleocytosis and increased myelin basic protein.||N/A||IV CS, IVIg, oral CS Chorea improved on day 15, w/ an immediate resolution on day 22.|
|Kopscik et al. , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR and serology, Inpatient||Multiple cranial nerve abnormalities, dysmetria, sensory ataxia, and absent LL reflexes||Brain MRI: unremarkable||Anti-GQ1b IgG Abs (1:100), w/ lymphocytic predominance, normal protein||N/A||Convalescent plasma, tocilizumab, and intravenous immunoglobulin.|
|Fernández-Domínguez et al., , Spain, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR and serology, Inpatient||LL areflexia, sensory gait ataxia.||Brain MRI: unremarkable||Increased protein level (110 mg/dl) Normal cell count. Neg. antiganglioside Abs. SARS-CoV-2 neg..||
EMG: slight F-wave delay in ULs.
Visual evoked potential: unremarkable
|IVIg, w/ improv..|
|Dinkin et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Partial unilat. oculomotor palsy, Bilat. abducens palsies. LL hyporeflexia and hypesthesia, and gait ataxia.||Brain MRI: enhancement, T2-hyperintensity, and enlargement of oculomotor nerve||Ganglioside Abs: neg.||N/A||IVIg, w/ improv..|
|Perrin et al., , France, Retr., Obs.||Hospital, 5 cases, RT-qPCR, ICU, 2 w/ mechanical ventilation||Confusion (n = 5), tremor (n = 5), cerebellar ataxia (n = 4), behavioral alterations (n = 5), aphasia (n = 4), pyramidal synd. (n = 4), coma (n = 2), cranial nerve palsy (n = 1),||Brain MRI: acute leukoencephalitis (cases 1, 2, and 4), microbleeds in the corpus callosum (1); cytotoxic edema mimicking stroke (case 2), and normal results (cases 3 and 5);||SARS-CoV-2 PCR: neg.. CSF/serum albumin index increased (3), Normal cell count (5), Absent IgG intrathecal synthesis (5), OCBs (3), Antineuronal Abs absent (5).||
Case 1: EEG: asymmetric slow-wave spikes and occipital focus
Case 2: EEG: slow Bilat. delta bursts or predominant opposite bifrontal diversions w/ Bilat. 5–6 Hz theta
Case 3: normal
|Case 1: CS (DM)
Case 2: CS (DM) + IVIg w/ improv.
Case 3, 4: spontaneous recovery
Case 3: CS (DM + MP) w/ improv.
|Hayashi et al., , Japan, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, ICU||Marked dysmetria and mild ataxic gait||Brain MRI: hyperintensity in splenium of corpus callosum on DWI [mild encephalitis/encephalopathy w/ a reversible splenial lesion (MERS)]||N/A||N/A||Spontaneous recovery of neurologic symptoms|
|Khoo et al., , England, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Myoc., ocular flutter, convergence spasm, hyperekplexia, confusion||Brain MRI: normal||Unremarkable. Neg. viral PCR panel. Neg. SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Neg. antineuronal Abs.||EEG: normal||Levetiracetam, clonazepam w/ partial improv. in myoc. and hyperekplexia. CS (MP and prednisone); all neurological symptoms improved|
|Pilotto et al., , Italy, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Irritability, confusion, and asthenia. Severe akinetic synd. and mutism; Frontal release signs, nuchal rigidity.||
Head CT: unremarkable
Brain MRI: unremarkable
|Lymphocytic pleocytosis (18/uL), increased protein (69.6 mg/dL). Neg. viral panel. Neg. SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Neg. OCBs and antineuronal Abs.||EEG: Generalized background slowing, decreased reactivity||CS (MP 1 g/day (five days), prednisone, w/ improv.|
|Delorme et al., , France, Case series||Hospital,
2 cases, RT-qPCR, Inpatient
Case 1: psychomotor agitation, cognitive/behavioral frontal synd., UL myoc., cerebellar ataxia.
Case 2: psychomotor agitation, anxiety, depressed mood, dysexecutive and cerebellar synd. (hypotonia, gait ataxia, dysmetria, dysarthria, nystagmus)
Brain FDG-PET: Bilat. prefrontal and left parieto-temporal hypometab., hypermetab. in vermis
bilat. Orbitofrontal hypometab., Bilat. Hypermetab. in striatum and vermis.
CSF 1: Mild pleocytosis (6 cells/mm3), normal protein.
CSF 2: 0 cells/m3, normal protein.
|EEG: normal in both cases||1: IVIg 2 g/kg. Gradual improv., up to 6 weeks long.
2: CS (2 mg/kg/day for 3 days).
Improved cerebellar symptoms. Antidepressants (paroxetine and mirtazapine)
|Caan et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Hallucinations, delusions, apathy, muscle rigidity and diaphoresis, catatonia.||Brain MRI: unremarkable||Normal cell count, protein, and gluc. level.||N/A||Lorazepam with partial recovery|
|Pilotto et al., , Italy, Longitudinal, multicentric||Hospital, 25 encephalitis cases, 1 w/ a mov. disorder, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Altered mental status w/ extrapyramidal synd. (parkinsonian synd.)||Brain MRI: frontal T2 hyperintensities||Cels.: 4/mm3; mildly elevated protein;||N/A||N/A|
|Povlow et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Nausea, dysarthria, dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, mod. appendicular ataxia, unable to stand unassisted.||Brain MRI: unremarkable||Mild lymphocytic pleocytosis (7 cells/mm3), normal protein, neg. meningitis/encephalitis panel; neg. OCBs.||N/A||Spontaneous partial recovery|
|Franke et al., , Germany, Retrospective case series||Hospital, 8 cases w/ a mov. disorder, RT-qPCR, ICU – respiratory status not available||
Case 1: nystagmus, orofacial myoc., delirium
Case 2: nystagmus, generalized stimulus-sensitive myoc.
Case 3: unilat. stimulus-sensitive myoc.
Case 4: unilat. orofacial myoc.
Case 5: Delirium, myoc., epileptic seizures
Case 6: unilat. faciobrachial myoc., multifocal strokes
Case 7: Oculomotor paresis, transient generalized myoc., prolonged awakening
Case 8: Asym. Dystonia (UL), delirium
Head CT: Normal (4);
PET-FDG: increased metab. in basal ganglia, limbic system, and cerebellum (1).
Brain MRI: Marked fornix edema (1), right middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemia (1)
|Fernando et al., , Philippines, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, Inpatient||Bilat., asynchronous, irregular myoc. (UL, LL)||Brain MRI: unremarkable||N/A||N/A||Resolution 2 weeks after hydroxychloroquine withdraw|
|Deocleciano de Araujo et al., , Brazil, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR, ICU||Disorganized behavior, social withdrawal, reduced motor output, body stiffness, negativism, refusal to feed, weight loss.||Head CT: normal||Protein 55 mg/dL||N/A||Lorazepam, sertraline, Electroconvulsive therapy, resolution after 50 days|
|Emamikhah et al., , Iran, Case series||Hospital, 7 cases, Rt-qPCR (5 cases), serology (1 case), clinical (1 case) Inpatient||Myoc. (7), opsoclonus (3), ataxia (7), voice tremor (6).||
Head CT: normal (2);
Brain MRI: normal (4)
|Normal cell count (3), protein (3), gluc. (3).
Neg. OCBs (1).
|EEG: normal (1).||Clonazepam (6),
IVIg (5), CS (1)
|Urrea-Mendoza et al., , USA, Case report||Hospital, 1 case, RT-qPCR Inpatient||Opsoclonus, myoc., and ataxia||Brain MRI: normal||N/A||N/A||Clonazepam, valproate (divalproex), steroids|
The cases came generally from regions where COVID-19 epidemics were on course. A proportion of 57.0% of the cases were reported in Europe (n = 53), 26.9% in the Americas (n = 25), 15% in Asia (n = 14), 1% in Oceania (n = 1). Most reported cases came from France (n = 17, 18.3%), United States (n = 17, 18.3%), Spain (n = 16, 17.2%), followed by Brazil (n = 8, 8.6%), Iran (n = 8, 8.6%) Germany (n = 8, 8.6%), Italy (n = 7, 7.5%), United Kingdom (n = 3, 3.2%) and China (n = 3, 3.2%). Japan, Netherlands, Israel, New Zealand, Philippines, and Belgium reported 1 case each (1.1% each), as represented in Figure 2.
The major findings are depicted in Figure 3 as Bayesian binomial posterior proportions. Table 1 summarizes the clinical and ancillary exam data from each original study to serve as a simple reference guide for physicians and researchers.
Of the 93 movement disorder cases identified in the literature search [3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51], myoclonus was present in 63.4% (n = 59), ataxia in 38.7% (n = 36), action/postural tremor in 10.8% (n = 10), rigid-akinetic syndrome (parkinsonism) in 5.38% (n = 5), oculomotor abnormalities (opsoclonus, ocular flutter) in 20.4% (n = 19), catatonia in 2.1% (n = 2), dystonia in 1.1% (n = 1), chorea in 1.1% (n = 1), functional (psychogenic) movement disorders in 3.2% (n = 3) of the reported COVID-19 cases with any movement disorder (Figure 2). Encephalopathy was a frequent association (n = 37, 39.8%), and stroke was detected in a minority of cases (n = 5, 5.4%).
As previously stated, the most prevalent movement disorder was myoclonus [4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 41, 43, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52], which often occurred in conjunction with encephalopathy/delirium. More than a third of the sample had ataxia [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 29, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 46, 50, 51], which often co-occurred with myoclonus. Oculomotor symptoms, such as saccadic oscillations (opsoclonus, ocular flutter), have also been documented and were often associated with ataxia [13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 27, 29, 41, 43, 47, 50, 51]. Among the cases presenting with ataxia, a few were associated with acute polyradiculopathy/neuropathy (sensory ataxia, in the context of Miller-Fisher syndrome) [19, 20, 37]. In contrast, others presented cerebellar ataxia in a cerebellitis context  or unremarkable MRI and CSF examinations [16, 17, 18, 21, 25, 27].
Not surprisingly, confusional or encephalopathic states were highly prevalent in patients with action and stimulus-sensitive myoclonus. Myoclonus is a frequent involuntary movement in critically ill patients triggered or aggravated by several different drugs or by metabolic or hypoxia-related brain dysfunction . Encephalopathy and delirium are very prevalent in critical care , and the reviewed sample has a significant proportion of hospitalized and critical patients. Three cases of new-onset rigid-akinetic parkinsonism were described in detail [10, 11, 26], one of which presented with encephalopathy and generalized myoclonus , two of which were preceded only by a mild respiratory syndrome [10, 26].
Some de novo movement disorders were presumably drug-induced: two serotonin syndrome cases possibly related to lopinavir/ritonavir combined with drugs with serotonergic properties, and three tardive syndrome cases (described as rigid-akinetic syndromes combined to orobuccal stereotypies) . Due to incomplete information, it was not feasible to establish a causal link between myoclonus and drug administration in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, in whom sedative agents, especially opioids, or antipsychotic medications, may have contributed to myoclonus.
Neuroimaging (Brain MRI or head CT) findings were reported in 82.8% (n = 77) of the 93 cases. About two-thirds (n = 56, 72.7%) of these cases demonstrated normal or non-related findings (chronic findings, such as white matter small vessel disorder). Five patients had cerebral microbleeds (6.5%). Stroke was disclosed in 4 cases (5.2%). Post-contrast focal enhancement or edema was seen in 10 cases (12.9%). Some of these observations are described in greater detail below: Gadolinium (Gd) enhancement of the oculomotor nerve (in a Miller-Fisher syndrome case, 1/77, 1.3%), cerebellar edema with Gd enhancement (1/77, 1.3%), cortical or brainstem hypoxic-ischemic lesions (2/77, 2.6%), pachymeningeal enhancement (1/77, 1.3%), acute leukoencephalitis (3/77, 3.9%), splenium DWI hyperintensity (1/77, 1.3%), splenium microbleeds (1/77, 1.3%), fornix edema (1/77, 1.3%), orbitofrontal hyperintensity (1/77, 1.3%), middle cerebral artery stroke (2, 2.6%), and multiple focal enhancing lesions in putamen and cerebellum (1, 1.3%).
FDG-PET scan was performed in five patients, as described below. It showed normal glucose metabolism in a case with parkinsonism . Two of these five scanned patients had myoclonus and ataxia [34, 43], one had ataxia and other cerebellar signs , and one had orofacial myoclonus . FDG-PET revealed hypermetabolic cerebellum in all four cases: two also had hypermetabolism in the basal ganglia, while the other three had cortical hypometabolism.
The three parkinsonism cases had confirmed nigrostriatal denervation by functional dopaminergic imaging, using 18F-DOPA PET, DAT-Scan, or TRODAT-1 SPECT.
For 48.4% (n = 45) of the examined cases, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was available. About 73.3 % (n = 33) of the patients had a normal cell count, while 26.7% (n = 12) had mild-to-moderate pleocytosis. We observed that 51% (n = 23) of patients had normal CSF protein levels, while 49.9% (n = 22) had slightly elevated protein levels.
Antineuronal paraneoplastic antibodies (Abs) were not detected in any of the cases when a standardized Abs panel was tested (n = 9). Antibodies against Purkinje cells, striatal, and hippocampal neurons were observed in one patient with subacute cerebellar syndrome and myoclonus utilizing tissue immunostaining . Franke et al. used indirect immunofluorescence to screen antibodies against novel CNS epitopes in unfixed mouse brain sections. They found staining associated with vessel endothelium, astrocytic proteins, and neuropil of basal ganglia, hippocampus, or olfactory bulb .
SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR positivity in CSF samples appears to be uncommon: it was detected in only one case of cerebellitis .
EEG findings were available in 29% (n = 27) of the cases. Of these, 59.3% (n = 16) had background slowing, while 33.3% (n = 9) had normal results. In one case, lateralized periodic discharges were observed in association with diaphragmatic myoclonus , while in another, frontal spikes were observed . Two studies (three cases) used neurophysiological measures to characterize the possible CNS topographic origin of myoclonus [15, 31], using a combination of EEG and EMG or jerk-locked registers. Two of the three cases had cortical/subcortical origin, and one, a subcortical source.
In 39.8% of the cases (n = 37), the information about treatment attempts was incomplete or missing. There was immunotherapy with oral/intravenous steroids (n = 21, 37.5%). In 11 cases, the corticosteroid therapy targeted the movement disorder; in 5 cases, it targeted COVID-19-related inflammatory reaction and, in 4 cases, the target was not clear. Immunoglobulin (IVIg) was used in 32.14% (n = 18) of the reported cases with available treatment information (n = 56). In all of these cases, IVIg therapy was targeting the movement disorder. Plasma exchange was tried in one case. Immunotherapy was used primarily in inpatient settings, but cases ranged from mild to critically ill in mechanical ventilation.
Antiepileptic drugs and benzodiazepines such as clonazepam (n = 17), levetiracetam (n = 16), valproic acid (n = 10), and lorazepam (n = 5) seemed to be favored for symptomatic care, mostly for the myoclonus presentation. Additionally, dexmedetomidine (n = 5), ketamine (n = 1), primidone (n = 1), and midazolam (n = 1) were used in treatment attempts.
In this analysis, we generated a regression using Bayesian zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP), a model for counts-based datasets with an excess of zero-valued data in the dependent variable (assuming a constant zero-inflation probability across observations). A value of “zero” indicates that nothing occurred, which may be because the events’ rate is low or because the process that causes events failed to start.
Within the data extracted from the sample of COVID-19 associated with new-onset movement disorders, myoclonus was associated with normal neuroimaging results (head CT or brain MRI) and encephalopathy (left side of Figure 4), where the posterior densities of the beta distributions (obtained from the Bayesian zero-inflated Poisson regression) do not exceed zero (central line). When ataxia was used as the outcome variable (right side of Figure 4), no relation was observed (all posterior beta densities crossed zero) with the dependent variables.
Cluster analysis was utilized to infer movement disorders syndromic grouping from the reviewed articles. According to a seven indices ensembling method (NbClust), we found two as the optimal number of clusters. The PAM method then evaluated dissimilarity among objects. By assembling two unique groups, the random forest (RF) clustering approach  identified 36 articles with a higher proportion of myoclonus reports associated with encephalopathy and eight articles with a higher proportion of myoclonus connected with ataxia or oculomotor disturbances.
We interpreted these findings as suggestive of at least two myoclonus-associated syndromes that might occur in COVID-19: (1) a syndrome that associates myoclonus and encephalopathic state (which, we speculate, may relate to with broader brain dysfunction and neuronal hyperexcitability due to clinical complications in critical care or pharmacological interactions); and (2) a post-viral syndrome with an autoimmune origin that links oculomotor disturbances, ataxia, and myoclonus, resembling an opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome.
Notably, myoclonus is the most frequently identified movement disorder associated with COVID-19. Myoclonus is defined as a sudden, brief involuntary muscle contraction (positive myoclonus) or abrupt cessation of muscle contraction (negative myoclonus) . It occurs in a wide variety of etiologies, including post anoxic (Lance-Adams syndrome), metabolic (liver and renal failure, electrolyte imbalances), toxic, drug-induced (opioids, levodopa, antidepressants, quinolones, antiepileptic drugs), paraneoplastic, autoimmune (as in opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome), infectious (or postinfectious), genetic and neurodegenerative disorders. Additionally, it can be categorized into cortical, subcortical, spinal, or peripheral myoclonus based on its underlying neurophysiology (CNS source) .
It is critical to emphasize that in cases stated to be associated with COVID-19, several factors can contribute to the incidence of myoclonus: kidney failure, usage of provoking drugs in the context of intensive care, such as antibiotics, fentanyl, propofol, or phenytoin, as well as prolonged and sustained hypoxia [33, 56].
Muccioli et al. conducted a comprehensive clinical and paraclinical assessment, suggesting that myoclonus could have a subcortical origin . Interestingly, a proportion of myoclonus cases seemed to present in a delayed-onset compared to the infectious syndrome [28, 29, 30]; concurrent ataxic manifestations were not unusual. Recent publications have emphasized the description of opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia (in its complete or incomplete clinical syndrome) and included clinical improvement after IVIg therapy [27, 50, 51]. Myoclonic jerks were usually symptomatically treated with antiepileptic drugs (levetiracetam and valproate) and benzodiazepines (clonazepam, lorazepam).
According to a published comment on this topic, myoclonus’s underlying pathophysiology in COVID-19 may have a post-hypoxic or a postinfectious nature . Although a putative physiopathology involving antigenic cross-reactivity with neuronal proteins from the brainstem or cerebellum remains hypothetical, an interesting case series from Germany provides initial support for this thesis . The CNS’s postulated role in the production of myoclonus could be attributed to brainstem hyperexcitability or even lack of cerebellar inhibitory output . Normal structural neuroimaging findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some of these movement disorders may be mediated by post-viral immune processes rather than structural lesions.
In a small number of cases, the CSF profile was examined. A few patients presented with mild mononuclear pleocytosis. The most frequently observed phenotype was normal cell count, mild hyperproteinemia, and normal glucose levels. The rise in CSF protein levels may be caused by blood-CSF barrier disruption, intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis, or even be secondary to pre-existing medical comorbidities. However, further research is needed to ascertain an intrathecal immunological or parainfectious reaction, using techniques such as Reiber diagram and comprehensive autoantibodies analysis .
FDG-PET results provide some insights: they indicate that in some cases, presenting as movement disorders, an active ongoing metabolic process involving primarily the cerebellum and basal ganglia is implicated . Additionally, they support a subcortical origin for myoclonus in COVID-19. Further research is required to validate this idea and better understand these metabolic PET patterns .
Parkinsonism related to SARS-CoV2 seems to be a very unusual manifestation. Brundin et al. hypothesized that parkinsonism links with COVID-19 through the following mechanisms: (a) vascular insults to the nigrostriatal system (if with imaging compatible with stroke); (b) neuroinflammation triggered by systemic inflammation; (c) neuroinvasion and direct neuronal damage by the virus, that could gain access to the brain via olfactory nerve or gastrointestinal/respiratory tract via the vagus nerve .
The three initial cases linking COVID-19 and parkinsonism had acutely developed severe symptoms, which could suggest a direct link between nigrostriatal damage and SARS-CoV-2 but are not indeed able to prove a causal relationship between COVID-19 and Parkinson’s disease [10, 11, 26]. Prodromal or presymptomatic PD could be unmasked when individuals are acutely ill. We could not reject that this might be the case in the reported patients with “acute onset” parkinsonism. Cohort studies of COVID-19 persistent anosmic cases, followed up for years, will help to disentangle such a link.
Serotonin syndrome was documented in two patients due to combined drugs for COVID-19 and other comorbidities . Due to the high prevalence of psychiatric disorders, it is critical to consider this a possible differential diagnosis when myoclonus is between the clinical signs, as it is a treatable condition.
Neuropathological assessment of COVID-19 came initially from small case series that described hypoxic injury, blood-brain barrier breakdown, microscopic infarcts, hemorrhagic and demyelinating white matter lesions, and a scarcity of RT-qPCR positivity in brain samples [59, 60, 61]. Microglial activation, microglial nodules, and neuronophagia have also been described . To our knowledge, no neuropathological study has been conducted to precisely examine the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and movement disorders during acute or post-acute infection.
Our study has several limitations: heterogeneity of the sample (with a predominance of case reports and case series), a bias towards hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 (requiring consultation with a neurology specialist), heterogeneity of available information, lack of a control group (composed of patients with similar infectious conditions, for example) for prevalence rates comparison. Even with a standardized data collection protocol, we could not address the issue of missing information. Thus, these findings produce hypotheses for future research rather than lead to causal inferences or overinterpretation.
Movement disorders were early (in the pandemic’s course) predicted to manifest in COVID-19 patients. However, they represent uncommon or underreported phenomena concerning the infected population as a whole . This brief study contributes to the clinical scenario of SARS-CoV-2. It guides general practicing neurologists to the potential identification of these uncommon movement disorders syndromes as part of COVID-19 symptomatology or a consequence of its pharmacological management or clinical complications. Myoclonus and ataxia deserve special attention in upcoming studies: these two manifestations were the most prevalent in the reviewed data, could appear in combination, and may have an immune origin. The direct link between movement disorders and SARS-CoV-2 (and its underlying mechanisms) will be established or disproved in still lacking comprehensive neurophysiological, molecular, pathological, and neuroimaging studies with large samples.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
PB and TG assisted in the research design, data analysis, and manuscript writing; DP, RM, and FC assisted in the data analysis and manuscript writing. The published version of the manuscript was read and approved by all authors.
Zubair AS, McAlpine LS, Gardin T, Farhadian S, Kuruvilla DE, Spudich S. Neuropathogenesis and Neurologic Manifestations of the Coronaviruses in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Neurology. 2020; 77(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2065
Munhoz RP, Pedroso JL, Nascimento FA, et al. Neurological complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2020; 78(5): 290–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20200051
Romero-Sánchez CM, Díaz-Maroto I, Fernández-Díaz E, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry. Neurology. 2020; 95(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937
Studart-Neto A, Guedes BF, Tuma RL, et al. Neurological consultations and diagnoses in a large, dedicated COVID-19 university hospital. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2020; 78(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20200089
Bürkner P-C. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017; 80(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Stan Development Team. Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, 2.26. https://mc-stan.org.
Gabry J, Simpson D, Vehtari A, Betancourt M, Gelman A. Visualization in Bayesian workflow. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2019; 182(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12378
Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A. NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014; 61(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06
Schubert E, Rousseeuw PJ. Faster k-Medoids Clustering: Improving the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithms. In: Amato G, Gennaro C, Oria V, Radovanović M, (eds.) Vol 11807. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 171–187. Springer International Publishing; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32047-8_16
Faber I, Brandão PRP, Menegatti F, Carvalho Bispo DD, Maluf FB, Cardoso F. Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Parkinsonism: A Non-post-encephalitic Case. Movement Disorders. 2020; 35(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28277
Méndez-Guerrero A, Laespada-García MI, Gómez-Grande A, et al. Acute hypokinetic-rigid syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurology. 2020; 95(15). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010282
Piscitelli D, Perin C, Tremolizzo L, Peroni F, Cerri CG, Cornaggia CM. Functional movement disorders in a patient with COVID-19. Neurological Sciences. 2020; 41(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04593-1
Mas Serrano M, Pérez-Sánchez JR, Portela Sánchez S, et al. Serotonin syndrome in two COVID-19 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020; 415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.116944
Rábano-Suárez P, Bermejo-Guerrero L, Méndez-Guerrero A, et al. Generalized myoclonus in COVID-19. Neurology. 2020; 95(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009829
Cuhna P, Herlin B, Vassilev K, et al. Movement disorders as a new neurological clinical picture in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. European Journal of Neurology. 2020; 27(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14474
Paterson RW, Brown RL, Benjamin L, et al. The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Brain. 2020; 143(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa240
Chaumont H, San-Galli A, Martino F, et al. Mixed central and peripheral nervous system disorders in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Journal of Neurology. 2020; 267(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09986-y
Dijkstra F, van den Bossche T, Willekens B, Cras P, Crosiers D. Myoclonus and Cerebellar Ataxia Following COVID-19. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13049
Gutiérrez-Ortiz C, Méndez-Guerrero A, Rodrigo-Rey S, et al. Miller Fisher syndrome and polyneuritis cranialis in COVID-19. Neurology. 2020; 95(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009619
Lantos JE, Strauss SB, Lin E. COVID-19–Associated Miller Fisher Syndrome: MRI Findings. American Journal of Neuro-radiology. 2020; 41(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6609
Balestrino R, Rizzone M, Zibetti M, et al. Onset of Covid-19 with impaired consciousness and ataxia: a case report. Journal of Neurology. 2020; 267(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09879-0
Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurology. 2020; 77(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127
Fadakar N, Ghaemmaghami S, Masoompour SM, et al. A First Case of Acute Cerebellitis Associated with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): a Case Report and Literature Review. The Cerebellum. 2020; 19(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-020-01177-9
Xiong W, Mu J, Guo J, et al. New onset neurologic events in people with COVID-19 in 3 regions in China. Neurology. 2020; 95(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010034
Klein S, Davis F, Berman A, Koti S, D’Angelo J, Kwon N. A Case Report of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Presenting with Tremors and Gait Disturbance. Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine. 2020; 4(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2020.5.48023
Cohen ME, Eichel R, Steiner-Birmanns B, et al. A case of probable Parkinson’s disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Lancet Neurology. 2020; 19(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30305-7
Sanguinetti S, Ramdhani RA. Opsoclonus Myoclonus Ataxia Syndrome Related to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2020; Ahead of Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001129
Ros-Castelló V, Quereda C, López-Sendón J, Corral I. Post-Hypoxic Myoclonus after COVID-19 Infection Recovery. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13025
Wright D, Rowley R, Halks-Wellstead P, Anderson T, Wu TY. Abnormal Saccadic Oscillations Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Encephalopathy and Ataxia. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13101
Muccioli L, Rondelli F, Ferri L, Rossini G, Cortelli P, Guarino M. Subcortical Myoclonus in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Comprehensive Evaluation of a Patient. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13046
Borroni B, Gazzina S, Dono F, et al. Diaphragmatic myoclonus due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurological Sciences. 2020; 41(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04766-y
Schellekens MMI, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Keurlings PAJ, Mummery CJ, Bloem BR. Reversible Myoclonus-Ataxia as a Postinfectious Manifestation of COVID-19. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13088
Anand P, Zakaria A, Benameur K, et al. Myoclonus in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Multicenter Case Series. Critical Care Medicine. 2020; 48(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004570
Grimaldi S, Lagarde S, Harlé J-R, Boucraut J, Guedj E. Autoimmune Encephalitis Concomitant with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Insight from 18 F-FDG PET Imaging and Neuronal Autoantibodies. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2020; 61(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.249292
Byrnes S, Bisen M, Syed B, et al. COVID-19 encephalopathy masquerading as substance withdrawal. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020; 92(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26065
Kopscik M, Giourgas B, Presley B. A Case Report of Acute Motor and Sensory Polyneuropathy as the Presenting Symptom of SARS-CoV-2. Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine. 2020; 4(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2020.6.48683
Fernández-Domínguez J, Ameijide-Sanluis E, García-Cabo C, García-Rodríguez R, Mateos V. Miller–Fisher-like syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Journal of Neurology. 2020; 267(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09912-2
Dinkin M, Gao V, Kahan J, et al. COVID-19 presenting with ophthalmoparesis from cranial nerve palsy. Neurology. 2020; 95(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009700
Perrin P, Collongues N, Baloglu S, et al. Cytokine release syndrome-associated encephalopathy in patients with COVID-19. European Journal of Neurology. 2021; 28(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14491
Hayashi M, Sahashi Y, Baba Y, Okura H, Shimohata T. COVID-19-associated mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020; 415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.116941
Khoo A, McLoughlin B, Cheema S, et al. Postinfectious brainstem encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2020; 91(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-323816
Pilotto A, Odolini S, Masciocchi S, et al. Steroid-Responsive Encephalitis in Coronavirus Disease 2019. Annals of Neurology. 2020; 88(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25783
Delorme C, Paccoud O, Kas A, et al. COVID-19 related encephalopathy: a case series with brain FDG-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography findings. European Journal of Neurology. 2020; 27(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14478
Caan MP, Lim CT, Howard M. A Case of Catatonia in a Man With COVID-19. Psychosomatics. 2020; 61(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.021
Pilotto A, Masciocchi S, Volonghi I, et al. Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2–Related Encephalitis: The ENCOVID Multicenter Study. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021; 223(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa609
Povlow A, Auerbach AJ. Acute Cerebellar Ataxia in COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 60(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.010
Franke C, Ferse C, Kreye J, et al. High frequency of cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. Published online December 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.12.022
Fernando EZ, Yu JRT, Santos SMA, Jamora RDG. Involuntary Movements Following Administration of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Pneumonia. Journal of Movement Disorders. 2021; 14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.20091
Deocleciano de Araujo C, Schlittler LXC, Sguario RM, Tsukumo DM, Dalgalarrondo P, Banzato CEM. Life-Threatening Catatonia Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Psychosomatics. Published online October 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2020.09.007
Emamikhah M, Babadi M, Mehrabani M, et al. Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, a post-infectious neurologic complication of COVID-19: case series and review of literature. Journal of NeuroVirology. 2021; 27(1): 26–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13365-020-00941-1
Urrea-Mendoza E, Okafor K, Ravindran S, Absher J, Chaubal V, Revilla FJ. Opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (Omas) associated with sars-cov-2 infection: Post-infectious neurological complication with benign prognosis. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2021; 11(1): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.580
Romero-Sánchez CM, Díaz-Maroto I, Fernández-Díaz E, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Neurology. 2020; 95(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937
Sutter R, Ristic A, Rüegg S, Fuhr P. Myoclonus in the critically ill: Diagnosis, management, and clinical impact. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016; 127(1): 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.08.009
Krewulak KD, Stelfox HT, Leigh JP, Ely EW, Fiest KM. Incidence and Prevalence of Delirium Subtypes in an Adult ICU. Critical Care Medicine. 2018; 46(12): 2029–2035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003402
Zutt R, van Egmond ME, Elting JW, et al. A novel diagnostic approach to patients with myoclonus. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2015; 11(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.198
Latorre A, Rothwell JC. Myoclonus and COVID-19: A Challenge for the Present, a Lesson for the Future. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2020; 7(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13103
Reiber H. Cerebrospinal fluid data compilation and knowledge-based interpretation of bacterial, viral, parasitic, oncological, chronic inflammatory and demyelinating diseases. Diagnostic patterns not to be missed in neurology and psychiatry. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2016; 74(4): 337–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20160044
Brundin P, Nath A, Beckham JD. Is COVID-19 a Perfect Storm for Parkinson’s Disease? Trends in Neurosciences. 2020; 43(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.009
Reichard RR, Kashani KB, Boire NA, Constantopoulos E, Guo Y, Lucchinetti CF. Neuropathology of COVID-19: a spectrum of vascular and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like pathology. Acta Neuropathologica. 2020; 140(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02166-2
Solomon IH, Normandin E, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Neuropathological Features of COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 383(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2019373
von Weyhern CH, Kaufmann I, Neff F, Kremer M. Early evidence of pronounced brain involvement in fatal COVID-19 outcomes. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10241). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31282-4
Thakur KT, Miller EH, Glendinning MD, et al. COVID-19 neuropathology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital. Brain. Published online April 15, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab148
Geyer HL, Kaufman DM, Parihar RK, Mehler MF. Movement Disorders in COVID-19: Whither Art Thou? Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2020; 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.553