Essential tremor (ET) is the most common tremor disorder and among the most prevalent of neurological disorders in adults.1 Kinetic tremor in the arms is characteristic of ET, although patients may also have cranial (neck, voice, jaw) tremors, and gait and balance issues.1–3 The cerebellum has been implicated in ET in clinical and neuroimaging studies.4–6 Pathological changes have also been observed in recent postmortem studies of the brains of ET patients. ET patients have six to seven times more Purkinje cell (PC) axonal swellings (“torpedoes”) than controls.7 Other significant pathological changes include an increase in PC dendritic swellings, an increase in heterotopic PCs, a reduction in the number of PCs (i.e., PC loss), and an unusually dense basket cell axonal plexus (“hairy baskets”) surrounding the PC soma.7–10
Dystonia is a neurological syndrome characterized by simultaneous contractions of agonist and antagonist muscles, resulting in sustained postures, twisting movements or tremor.11 Dystonic movements or postures may affect almost any part of the body, including the laryngeal muscles during speech (spasmodic dysphonia), the neck (torticollis), the periorbital muscles (blepharospasm), and the arms.11–13 Traditionally, dystonia has been attributed to dysfunction of the basal ganglia.14 However, several other brain regions, including the cerebellum, have recently been posited to contribute to the pathophysiology of dystonia.14 There are a limited number of human autopsy studies of patients who had dystonia, and even fewer that have examined the cerebellum.12,13,15–17 None quantified PCs.12,13,15–17 More recently, a group of investigators described mild PC loss in the cerebellum in adult onset primary focal dystonia.18 This finding is similar to what has been observed in the brains of ET patients.7
In the current study, four cases diagnosed during life with ET and dystonia were prospectively collected at the Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository (ETCBR) at Columbia University. We conducted a detailed postmortem examination of the brains of these four individuals, and hypothesized that pathological changes in the cerebellum would be greater in these ET+dystonia cases than in published ET cases without dystonia.
Each of these four ET+dystonia patients was enrolled as a participant in the ETCBR of the New York Brain Bank (NYBB) at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). The NYBB operates under approval of the institutional review board of CUMC.
Clinical ET diagnoses were carefully assigned using each of the following three sequential methods. First, cases were diagnosed clinically with ET by their treating physician (in three, this was a treating neurologist and in one, a general doctor). Second, cases were asked to complete a series of semi‐structured clinical questionnaires, which were supplemented with additional medical information (from clinical records, treating physicians, family members). Each case also produced four standardized hand‐drawn Archimedes spirals (two right and two left, each on a 8.5×11 inch sheet of paper). Based on these data, ET diagnoses were then confirmed by a senior neurologist specializing in movement disorders (E.D.L.) who used the following diagnostic criteria: 1) moderate or greater amplitude arm tremor (rating of 2 or higher) in at least one of the submitted Archimedes spirals (Figure 1), 2) no history of Parkinson's disease (PD), and 3) no other etiology for tremor (i.e., medications). Third, ET cases then underwent a standardized, videotaped neurological examination.19 The videotaped examination included several tests to elicit postural tremor (sustained arm extension) and five tests to elicit kinetic tremor (e.g., writing, pouring, drawing Archimedes spirals). Each of these six tests was performed with each arm (12 tests total). Videotaped action tremor was rated by a senior neurologist specializing in movement disorders (E.D.L.) during each test using a scale from 0 (no tremor) to 3 (large amplitude tremor), resulting in a total tremor score (range 0–36). The videotape protocol also included assessment of neck, voice, and jaw tremors. The videotaped examination incorporated the motor portion of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, including assessments of speech, facial expression, rest tremor, bradykinesia, posture, arising from a chair, and gait while walking and turning.20 Each videotape was reviewed (E.D.L.) and the diagnosis of ET was confirmed in each case using published diagnostic criteria that required the presence of moderate or greater amplitude tremor on three or more tests.21
Dystonia is defined as a disorder of sustained muscle contractions, often causing abnormal postures, or twisting and repetitive movements.11 In addition to dystonic postures or tremor during sustained arm extension, the videotape was assessed for the presence of spasmodic torticollis, voice tremor, and blepharospasm. Criteria for dystonia followed those recommended by Fahn.11 Spasmodic torticollis was defined as the presence of twisting or tilting movements of the neck, jerk‐like or sustained neck deviation, often with mild hypertrophy of neck muscles.22 Voice tremor was assessed during sustained phonation, while reading a prepared paragraph, and during speech. If present, voice tremor was attributed to ET (tremor without voice breaks, strangled speech) or dystonia (tremor with voice breaks, strangled speech).
As previously described, all brains underwent a complete neuropathological assessment at the NYBB, which included the harvesting of standardized blocks from 18 brain regions.23 All brains had standardized measurements of brain weight (grams), postmortem interval (PMI, hours between death and the placement of the brain in a cold room or upon ice), Braak and Braak Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging for neurofibrillary tangles, Braak PD staging, and the Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD ratings for neuritic plaques.24–27
As described, a standard 3×20×25 mm parasagittal, formalin‐fixed tissue block was harvested from the neocerebellum; the block included the cerebellar cortex, white matter, and dentate nucleus.28 For each of these four ET+dystonia cases, two sequential 7 µm thick paraffin sections were obtained. One was stained with luxol fast blue counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin (LH&E) and the other was stained with a Bielschowsky silver method. Torpedoes were counted throughout the entire LH&E and Bielschowsky‐stained sections.7 Heterotopic PCs and PC dendritic swellings were counted throughout the entire LH&E section, and PCs were counted in 15 100× fields (LH&E) and then averaged.7, 9, 10, 28 A semiquantitative rating of the appearance of the basket cell plexus surrounding PC bodies throughout Bielschowsky preparations was carried out, as previously described.8 The following scale was used: 0 (few, or no discernible processes); 1 (sparse number of processes); 2 (moderate number of processes); and 3 (dense tangle of processes). In some instances, the rater used intermediate values (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5).8 Counts in the four ET+dystonia brains were compared with published values from cerebellar ET brains collected through the ETCBR.7, 8, 9, 10
All four cases had an ET diagnosis during life (three by their treating neurologists, one by a general doctor) based on the presence of moderate‐to‐severe and longstanding kinetic and postural arm tremor (in Figure 1, see example of spirals in case 4). None of the cases had been exposed to cerebellar toxic medications, and none had clinical dementia or deep brain stimulation surgery. Based on the review of the videotaped neurological examination (E.D.L.), the ET diagnosis was reconfirmed using published diagnostic criteria. Each case had moderate to severe, bilateral kinetic and postural tremor of the arms.
Additionally, each case had mild torticollis that had not been self‐reported or recognized or diagnosed by their treating physician (Table 1). On videotape, cases 2, 3, and 4 also had subtle dystonic posturing of one or both arms during arm extension, and case 3 also had spasmodic dysphonia with voice breaks on sustained phonation. In contrast to the features of ET, the dystonia was subtle, unreported, undiagnosed, and mild.
On postmortem examination, none of the ET+dystonia brains had brainstem or cortical Lewy bodies (Table 2). Case 2 had a 1.1×1.2×1.3 cm infarct in the external segment of the left globus pallidus. Case 3 had a 0.4×0.8×2.1 cm infarct in the lateral portion of the right putamen. The basal ganglia (caudate, putamen, globus pallidum, substantia nigra pars compacta) were otherwise normal in these two cases, and normal in cases 1 and 4.
In cases 1, 2, and 4, torpedo counts (on both LH&E and Bielschowsky‐stained sections) were at the upper end or above that which has been reported and published in ET (Figure 2A,B). In cases 1 and 4, other counts (e.g., heterotopic PCs and PC dendritic swellings in case 1, and Basket plexus rating and PC dendritic swellings in case 4) were elevated as well (Figure 2). By contrast, most of the counts of cases 2 and 3 were well within the range of that which has been reported in ET (Figure 2A–F).
Clinical studies have implicated the cerebellum in the pathogenesis of ET, and postmortem studies have identified structural changes in the ET cerebellum.4–10 While the basal ganglia have traditionally been implicated in dystonia, cerebellar involvement has been suggested as well,14 and a recent study showed PC loss.18 We conducted a detailed postmortem examination of the brain in four individuals with clinical diagnoses of ET and dystonia.
Our findings for these four ET+dystonia cases were heterogeneous. Two ET+dystonia cases had more microscopic changes in the cerebellum than published ET cases; the other two cases had similar changes to published ET cases.7–10 Interestingly, the two cases (cases 1 and 4) with more microscopic changes in the cerebellum than published ET cases both had normal basal ganglia. Yet the other two cases (cases 2 and 3) each had a unilateral infarct in the basal ganglia. However, the clinical significance of these infarcts is not clear; indeed, in neither case could a unilateral lesion have accounted for their dystonic features, which were bilateral (Case 2) and widespread (torticollis, spasmodic dysphonia, left arm in Case 3).
To our knowledge, this is the first clinicopathological report on patients with both ET and dystonia. A recent study describes PC loss in adult onset primary focal dystonia.18 There are only a handful of postmortem studies conducted on dystonic human autopsy tissue, and only a few of these examine the cerebellum.12,13,15–17 None quantified PCs, torpedoes, or the microscopic changes we evaluated here. Thus, our contribution of four cases with both diagnoses seems to be unique. Yet additional studies, with larger samples, are still needed to explore the mechanistic basis of ET and dystonia.
Each case had moderate to severe, bilateral kinetic and postural tremor of the arms that was of long duration (25–67 years). In contrast to the signature feature of ET, the dystonia was subtle and mild. Indeed, the dystonia had not been self‐reported or recognized or diagnosed by their treating physician. However, the presence of torsional neck movements on the videotaped neurological examination was unmistakably identified as spasmodic torticollis by a senior movement disorder neurologist and other features of dystonia were clearly present on examination in several cases. This raises the conceptual issue as to whether the dystonia seen on the examination of these four cases was a clinical sign that was merely a manifestation of longstanding ET (i.e., one disease), or if these patients had two neurological diseases (ET and dystonia). A third, albeit remote, possibility is that these patients had dystonia only (i.e., their “ET” was all merely dystonic tremor). However, because of the long duration (25+ years) of bilateral kinetic and postural arm tremor, the family history of ET, the severity of the ET tremor, and other clinical features, this possibility is not tenable.
We hypothesized that pathological changes in the cerebellum would be greater in these ET+dystonia cases than in published ET cases without dystonia; thus, control data were not directly relevant to our study hypothesis. These data have been published in several prior reports7–10 and are readily available; they were not reproduced here.
Future work on the pathogenesis of dystonia, and whether it involves the cerebellum, is important. Clinical, imaging, electrophysiolgical, and postmortem studies are critical for the evaluation of this area.
1 Funding: This study was supported by R01 NS042859 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and by the Claire O'Neil Essential Tremor Research Fund (Columbia University).
2 Financial Disclosures: None.
3 Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflict of interest.
Parisi, SL, Héroux, ME, Culham, EG and Norman, KE (2006). Functional mobility and postural control in essential tremor.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 1357–1364, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.255 [PubMed]
Bucher, SF, Seelos, KC, Dodel, RC, Reiser, M and Oertel, WH (1997). Activation mapping in essential tremor with functional magnetic resonance imaging.. Ann Neurol 41: 32–40, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410410108 [PubMed]
Jenkins, IH Bain, PG Colebatch, JG et al. (1993). A positron emission tomography study of essential tremor: evidence for overactivity of cerebellar connections.. Ann Neurol 34: 82–90, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410340115 [PubMed]
Louis, ED Faust, PL Vonsattel, JP et al. (2007). Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls.. Brain 130: 3297–3307, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm266 [PubMed]
Erickson-Davis, CR, Faust, PL, Vonsattel, JP, Gupta, S, Honig, LS and Louis, ED (2010). “Hairy baskets” associated with degenerative Purkinje cell changes in essential tremor.. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69: 262–271, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181d1ad04 [PubMed]
Yu, M Ma, K Faust, PL et al. (2011). Increased number of Purkinje cell dendritic swellings in essential tremor.. Eur J Neurology 19: 625–630, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03598.x
Kuo, SH, Erickson-Davis, C, Gillman, A, Faust, PL, Vonsattel, JPG and Louis, ED (2011). Increased number of heterotopic Purkinje cells in essential tremor.. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82: 1038–1040, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.213330 [PubMed]
Simonyan, K Tovar-Moll, F Ostuni, J et al. (2008). Focal white matter changes in spasmodic dysphonia: a combined diffusion tensor imaging and neuropathological study.. Brain 131: 447–459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm303 [PubMed]
Rostasy, K Augood, SJ Hewett, JW et al. (2002). TorsinA protein and neuropathology in early onset generalized dystonia with GAG deletion.. Neurobiol Dis 12: 11–24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-9961(02)00010-4 [PubMed]
Dystonia Medical Research FoundationHighlights from the 5th international dystonia symposium. Update newsletter to European Dystonia Federation Members [Internet]. Benson, M and Newton, A eds. Winter 2011 [cited 2012 April 29]. Available from: http://www.dystonia‐europe.org/europe/Link_Information/Link_publications_newsletters/Updates/WINTER%202011.pdf
Louis, ED, Zheng, W, Applegate, L, Shi, L and Factor-Litvak, P (2005). Blood harmane concentrations and dietary protein consumption in essential tremor.. Neurology 65: 391–396, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000172352.88359.2d [PubMed]
Louis, ED Asabere, N Agnew, A et al. (2011). Rest tremor in advanced essential tremor: a post-mortem study of nine cases.. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82: 261–265, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.215681 [PubMed]
Louis, ED Ottman, R Ford, B et al. (1997). The Washington Heights-Inwood genetic study of essential tremor: methodologic issues in essential-tremor research.. Neuroepidemiology 16: 124–133, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000109681 [PubMed]
Louis, ED, Rios, E and Rao, AK (2010). Tandem gait performance in essential tremor: clinical correlates and association with midline tremors.. Mov Disord 25: 1633–1638, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23144 [PubMed]
Vonsattel, JP Aizawa, H Ge, P et al. (1995). An improved approach to prepare human brains for research.. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 54: 42–56, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199501000-00006 [PubMed]
Braak, H, Alafuzoff, I, Arzberger, T, Kretzschmar, H and Del Tredici, K (2006). Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry.. Acta Neuropathol 112: 389–404, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z [PubMed]
Braak, H, Del Tredici, K, Rub, U, de Vos, RA, Jansen Steur, EN and Braak, E (2003). Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease.. Neurobiol Aging 24: 197–211, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9 [PubMed]
Mirra, SS (1997). The CERAD neuropathology protocol and consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a commentary.. Neurobiol Aging 18: S91–94, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00058-4 [PubMed]
Louis, ED, Vonsattel, JP, Honig, LS, Ross, GW, Lyons, KE and Pahwa, R (2006). Neuropathologic findings in essential tremor.. Neurology 66: 1756–1759, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000218162.80315.b9 [PubMed]
Harasymiw, JW and Bean, P (2001). Identification of heavy drinkers by using the early detection of alcohol consumption score.. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25: 228–235, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02203.x [PubMed]