Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Reviews

The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model

Authors:

H. A. Jinnah ,

Departments of Neurology, Human Genetics and Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US
X close

Vladimir Neychev,

Department of Surgery, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment ‘‘Alexandrovska’’, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BG
X close

Ellen J. Hess

Departments of Pharmacology and Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US
X close

Abstract

Background: The dystonias include a clinically and etiologically very diverse group of disorders. There are both degenerative and non-degenerative subtypes resulting from genetic or acquired causes. Traditionally, all dystonias have been viewed as disorders of the basal ganglia. However, there has been increasing appreciation for involvement of other brain regions including the cerebellum, thalamus, midbrain, and cortex. Much of the early evidence for these other brain regions has come from studies of animals, but multiple recent studies have been done with humans, in an effort to confirm or refute involvement of these other regions. The purpose of this article is to review the new evidence from animals and humans regarding the motor network model, and to address the issues important to translational neuroscience.

Methods: The English literature was reviewed for articles relating to the neuroanatomical basis for various types of dystonia in both animals and humans.

Results: There is evidence from both animals and humans that multiple brain regions play an important role in various types of dystonia. The most direct evidence for specific brain regions comes from animal studies using pharmacological, lesion, or genetic methods. In these studies, experimental manipulations of specific brain regions provide direct evidence for involvement of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, thalamus and other regions. Additional evidence also comes from human studies using neuropathological, neuroimaging, non-invasive brain stimulation, and surgical interventions. In these studies, the evidence is less conclusive, because discriminating the regions that cause dystonia from those that reflect secondary responses to abnormal movements is more challenging.

Discussion: Overall, the evidence from both animals and humans suggests that different regions may play important roles in different subtypes of dystonia. The evidence so far provides strong support for the motor network model. There are obvious challenges, but also advantages, of attempting to translate knowledge gained from animals into a more complete understanding of human dystonia and novel therapeutic strategies.

How to Cite: Jinnah HA, Neychev V, Hess EJ. The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2017;7:506. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7916/D8V69X3S
Published on 23 Oct 2017.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

  • EPUB (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus